<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
  <title>Darwin&#039;s Theories - macintosh tag</title>
  <link>http://theories.darwinsys.com:80/tags/macintosh/</link>
  <description>Call it a Blog if you like -- Ian</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <copyright>Ian Darwin</copyright>
  <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:35:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>Pebble (http://pebble.sourceforge.net)</generator>
  <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
  
  
  <item>
    <title>Apple Mac OS 10.4 minor security glitch</title>
    <link>http://theories.darwinsys.com:80/2005/05/11/1115812800000.html</link>
    
      
        <description>
          When you move the mouse into the &amp;quot;hot corner&amp;quot; to activate Screen Lock, there is a brief interval (maybe only a second) during which if you move the mouse out of the hot corner, the screen is unlocked!!! &lt;br /&gt;
This is idiotic.  As I have said many times, Apple should abolish the use of &amp;quot;hot corners&amp;quot; to enable screen lock, and use their own standard GUI guidelines of providing a single PUSH BUTTON to be clicked on in the mouse in order to activate screen lock. &lt;br /&gt;
This could go in the Apple menu, along with Sleep/Restart/Shutdown. Or it could be a Preference to &amp;quot;Show in Menubar&amp;quot; (like for Clock and Displays). Or it could even be a program you start from the Dock (but supported, not the old kludge of drag the Screen lock internal DLL into the dock). &lt;br /&gt;
But it must be clear, unambiguous, and irrevocable; once it&#039;s pressed you should not be able to do ANYTHING until you have entered the password.
        </description>
      
      
    
    
    
    <category>Software Industry</category>
    
    <comments>http://theories.darwinsys.com:80/2005/05/11/1115812800000.html#comments</comments>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://theories.darwinsys.com:80/2005/05/11/1115812800000.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <title>Tiger v. Tiger: Apple does a Bad Bunny to Java</title>
    <link>http://theories.darwinsys.com:80/2005/05/02/1115035200000.html</link>
    
      
        <description>
          &lt;a href=&#034;http://www.apple.com/macosx&#034;&gt;Apple&#039;s much-heralded Tiger&lt;/a&gt;, offically called Mac OS X 10.4, contains many nice advances, including Dashboard, Automator, and more. But concurrent with Tiger&#039;s release, Apple appears to have gone out of their way to break Sun&#039;s venerable old &amp;quot;Write Once, Run Anywhere&amp;quot; mantra. Not only are they a good six months behind the industry in releasing Sun&#039;s Tiger, known as Java Standard Edition 1.5 (aka &amp;quot;Java 5&amp;quot;). They also solemnly refuse to  release Java 1.5 for even their current OS, Mac OS 10.3. Presumably this is to pressure people to buy 10.4. That&#039;s their choice, but Java developers are left with a rather unpleasant conundrum: either give up on all the nice features of Java&#039;s Tiger, or give up on compatibility with Apple&#039;s Tiger. &lt;br /&gt;
The fact is that many people would have upgraded without pressure like this. I bought 10.4 today, the first full day it was on sale in stores in Toronto, and several hours before I found that the Java was not backwards compatible. But now I&#039;m going to think twice before upgrading again. By the time of the next upgrade, &lt;a href=&#034;http://www.openbsd.org/&#034;&gt;OpenBSD&lt;/a&gt; (my favorite free OS because of its security stance and record) may have good enough desktop support for  Mac laptops that I can &amp;quot;switch&amp;quot; completely - to free software. &lt;br /&gt;
There&#039;s no good in Apple&#039;s decision for developers or end users. After a bad choice like this, I think Apple will find that theirs is the Paper Tiger.
        </description>
      
      
    
    
    
    <category>Software Industry</category>
    
    <comments>http://theories.darwinsys.com:80/2005/05/02/1115035200000.html#comments</comments>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://theories.darwinsys.com:80/2005/05/02/1115035200000.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <title>Apple&#039;s Keynote Keeps Up</title>
    <link>http://theories.darwinsys.com:80/2003/09/12/1063368000000.html</link>
    
      
        <description>
          Catch my OReillyNet &lt;a href=&#034;http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/mac/2003/09/12/keynote.html&#034;&gt;review  of Keynote, Apple&#039;s new Presentation Software&lt;/a&gt; for Mac OS X.
        </description>
      
      
    
    
    
    <category>Software Industry</category>
    
    <comments>http://theories.darwinsys.com:80/2003/09/12/1063368000000.html#comments</comments>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://theories.darwinsys.com:80/2003/09/12/1063368000000.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2003 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <title>Mac Security Article</title>
    <link>http://theories.darwinsys.com:80/2003/02/20/1045742400000.html</link>
    
      
        <description>
          My article on Mac Security appears on &lt;a href=&#034;http://www.macdevcenter.com/pub/a/mac/2003/02/18/secure_tibook.html&#034;&gt; O&#039;ReillyNet&lt;/a&gt;.
        </description>
      
      
    
    
    
    <category>Software Industry</category>
    
    <comments>http://theories.darwinsys.com:80/2003/02/20/1045742400000.html#comments</comments>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://theories.darwinsys.com:80/2003/02/20/1045742400000.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2003 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <title>CNN agrees with me: Mac OS X is Good</title>
    <link>http://theories.darwinsys.com:80/2003/01/13/1042459200000.html</link>
    
      
        <description>
          CNN&#039;s technology writer Brian Clark agrees that &lt;a href=&#034;http://money.cnn.com/2003/01/02/technology/winners/index.htm&#034;&gt;OS X is UNIX for the masses&lt;/a&gt;.
        </description>
      
      
    
    
    
    <category>Software Industry</category>
    
    <comments>http://theories.darwinsys.com:80/2003/01/13/1042459200000.html#comments</comments>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://theories.darwinsys.com:80/2003/01/13/1042459200000.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  
  </channel>
</rss>

