<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
  <title>Darwin&#039;s Theories - climate_change tag</title>
  <link>http://theories.darwinsys.com:80/tags/climate_change/</link>
  <description>Call it a Blog if you like -- Ian</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <copyright>Ian Darwin</copyright>
  <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:35:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>Pebble (http://pebble.sourceforge.net)</generator>
  <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
  
  
  <item>
    <title>Climate Change Background Wrong!?</title>
    <link>http://theories.darwinsys.com:80/2005/03/18/1111147200000.html</link>
    
      
        <description>
          Two Canadian researchers have found significant flaws in  the original 1998 Mann, Bradley and Hughes Climate Change paper. Shows that the famous &amp;quot;hockey stick&amp;quot; upturn in temperature graphs - which is &lt;em&gt;the basis of most claims about climate change and the basis of most related public policy since then, including Kyoto - can be produced as effectively by random data as by the MBH98 data, and that the Mann paper mis-disclosed key aspects of the calculations&lt;/em&gt; used to produce the &amp;quot;hockey stick&amp;quot; graph. Worth reading, but very technical. Of course it does not mean that humans aren&#039;t contributing to climate change, only that we really don&#039;t have the prove that some activists claim we have.
        </description>
      
      
    
    
    
    <category>Politics</category>
    
    <comments>http://theories.darwinsys.com:80/2005/03/18/1111147200000.html#comments</comments>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://theories.darwinsys.com:80/2005/03/18/1111147200000.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  
  </channel>
</rss>

